---
title: "Lemwatch vs Checkly"
canonical: "https://lemwatch.com/compare/checkly"
competitor: "Checkly"
category: "synthetic"
last_verified: "2026-08-11"
source: "https://lemwatch.com"
---

# Lemwatch vs Checkly

> One-line: Your team writes Playwright scripts and wants synthetic API + browser checks in code. — otherwise Lemwatch is the broader fit. Lemwatch pairs uptime with SEO, visual diffs and status pages in a single per-site price — no scripting required.

## Quick facts

| | Lemwatch | Checkly |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Free tier | Yes (5 sites) | Yes |
| Entry paid tier | $19/mo (Pro, 50 sites) | $40/mo (Team) |
| Min check interval (paid) | 60s | 10s |
| Category | All-in-one uptime + SEO + visual | synthetic |
| Homepage | https://lemwatch.com | https://www.checklyhq.com |

## Where Checkly is strong

- Playwright-native synthetic checks — great for E2E API flows
- Monitoring-as-code via CLI and Terraform
- 10-second check interval on Team tier

## Where Checkly falls short

- Aimed at engineers; agency/marketing use cases are secondary
- No visual change detection for marketing pages
- Priced per check run — high-frequency monitors get costly

## When to choose Checkly over Lemwatch

Your team writes Playwright scripts and wants synthetic API + browser checks in code.

## When to choose Lemwatch

Lemwatch pairs uptime with SEO, visual diffs and status pages in a single per-site price — no scripting required.

_Canonical HTML page: https://lemwatch.com/compare/checkly_
_Facts verified: 2026-06-28_